Exploring Successful Cases

Below you can browse through a list of common legal defense categories. Each category provides real examples of individuals Mr. Spettigue has represented, their cases and their outcomes.

Courtroom setting with judge's bench and legal references

Fraud Cases

Fraud involves intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain. Courts carefully examine evidence to determine if the accused knowingly misled others. Fraud cases often hinge on proving intent and knowledge. Defense strategies may include showing lack of intent, mistaken identity, or procedural errors in evidence collection.

Cases

• R. v. E.H. – charged with “Fraud in excess of $250,000.00 from Employer – charges Withdrawn

• R. v. S.S. - charged with “Commercial Fraud” of $85,000.00 – charges Withdrawn

• R. v. J.G. - charged with passing counterfeit $100.00 bills – charges Withdrawn

• R. v. H.K. - charged with Welfare Fraud – charges Withdrawn

• R. v. L.O - charged with Defrauding Employer – Client Acquitted

Murder Cases

Murder charges encompass a broad spectrum, ranging from voluntary manslaughter to first-degree murder involving premeditation and intent to kill. The defense typically centers on challenging the prosecution's evidence of intent to kill or establishing justifiable homicide. This often involves the use of witness testimony, forensic evidence, and an examination of the circumstances leading up to the incident.

• R. v. D. S. - 1st Degree Murder - charge Withdrawn

Aggravated Assault/Assault/Weapons Cases

Assault charges vary widely, from simple assault to aggravated assault involving weapons or serious injury. The defense focuses on disproving intent to harm or establishing self-defense and often rely on witness testimony, video evidence, and the circumstances surrounding the incident.

Cases

• R. v. M.S. – Aggravated Assault w/Machete – Jury Trial; Acquitted

• R. v. J.W. - Assault w/Weapon – charges Withdrawn

• R. v. K.H. – Domestic Assault - Client enters Peace Bond; charges Withdrawn

• R. v. M.A. – Assault/Bodily Harm – Client pleads Guilty; Conditional Discharge

Sexual Assault Cases

Sexual assault charges encompass a range of offenses. Outcomes are influenced by factors such as the severity of the offense, the presence of prior convictions, and the evidence available in the case. Defense frequently revolves around intricate legal arguments concerning consent, evidentiary standards, and the protection of constitutional rights.

Cases

• R. v. D. M - Sexual Assault - charges Dismissed

• R. v. Y.B. – Sexual Assault – non-domestic – charges Dismissed

• R. v. M.K. – Sexual Assault – non-domestic – Client enters Peace Bond; charges Withdrawn 

• R. v. C.H. - Domestic Sexual Assault – charges Stayed for delay

• R. v. S.B. – Domestic Sexual Assault – charges Stayed for delay

• R. v. D.L. – Sexual Assault – Client Acquitted

• R. v. D. L. – Client charged with 2^nd Sexual Assault – Client enters Peace Bond; charges Withdrawn

• R. v. J.H. Domestic Sexual Assault – Client enters Peace Bond; charges Withdrawn

Criminal Harassment Cases

Criminal harassment involves engaging in conduct that causes another person to fear for their safety or the safety of others. This can include repeated unwanted communication or actions that create a hostile or intimidating environment. Defense strategies here often focus on intent, mistaken identity, or alibi.

Cases

• R. v. E.P. – under previous Counsel Client sentenced to 8 months real jail; client granted bail pending Appeal and after Spettigue Appeal sentence converted to House Arrest

• R. v. K.O.B. – previously self represented and convicted; Spettigue retained for sentencing process, sentence converted to Conditional Discharge

CDSA – Controlled Drugs and Substances Act Cases

Drug offenses include possession, trafficking, and manufacturing. Outcomes depend on the quantity involved, prior records, and the legality of search and seizure. Drug cases often involve technical legal arguments about evidence handling and constitutional rights.

Cases

• R. v. R.G. – Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking – Fentanyl (8 grams) – charges Withdrawn

• R. v. C.R. – Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking, Possession of Fentanyl (55 grams) – charges Withdrawn

Dangerous Driving/H.T.A. Cases

Driving/HTA offenses range from speeding to DUI. Outcomes depend on evidence like breathalyzer results and witness statements. Traffic cases often focus on technical details and procedural compliance.

Cases

Dangerous Driving

• R. v. A.G. – Dangerous Driving etc. – pled down to Careless Driving

Impaired/ .08

• R. v. J.H. – Impaired Driving during collision – Client Acquitted

• R. v. J.H. – Impaired Driving during collision – Client pled down to Careless Driving

• R. v. J.N. – Client had 5 Impaired Driving charges over several years;

  - 2 Acquittals

  - 1 pled down to Careless Driving

  - 2 Guilty Pleas - Client goes to Rehab.

• R. v. D.H. – Impaired Driving during collision – Client pled down to Careless Driving

• R. v. J.S. – Impaired Driving – Client pled down to Careless Driving

Possession of Stolen Property

Possession of stolen property can encompass a variety of situations, from having stolen goods in one's home to being found with stolen items during a traffic stop. The defense and outcomes of such cases depend on factors such as the evidence available, the circumstances of the arrest, witness testimonies, and the provenance of the property in question.

Cases

• R. v. R.G. – charged with Possession Stolen Motor Vehicle – charges Withdrawn

Internet Exploitation Cases

Internet exploitation charges, particularly those involving pornography, cover a variety of offenses. The outcomes of such cases can be significantly affected by factors including the severity of the offense, any prior convictions of the accused, and the quality of evidence presented. Defense strategies often hinge on complex legal arguments related to consent and evidentiary standards.

• R. v. B.D. – creation/possession material involving minors – charges Dismissed

• R. v. G. D. - charges Stayed for Delay

• R. v. R.G. - charges Withdrawn

Legal defense categories cover a wide range of offenses, each with unique challenges and outcomes. Whether a case ends in acquittal, conviction, or withdrawal heavily depends on legal strategy. By exploring specific cases within these categories, readers can gain a clearer picture of how a good defense works in practice .